On 04-06-20 23:19, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dan Cross about Re: Pandemic <=-
Talking to people nicely yields better results.
He doesn't want to hear if he's wrong about something: he'd
rather attach reporters who ask him tough questions than
deal with the substance of the question.
If I was the president and someone asked me if I was trying to make
money off the anti-malaria drug, I'd tell them as nicely as I can that they need to kiss my butt.
On 04-06-20 23:19, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dan Cross about Re: Pandemic <=-
Talking to people nicely yields better results.
It would be good if Trump followed that idea. Instead he demonizes any one who says something he does not like -- or fires them.
He doesn't want to hear if he's wrong about something: he'd
rather attach reporters who ask him tough questions than
deal with the substance of the question.
If I was the president and someone asked me if I was trying to make money off the anti-malaria drug, I'd tell them as nicely as I can tha they need to kiss my butt.
Except that there is mounting evidence that he may well be either making money directly or helping out a large campaign contributor by touting
that drug.
Are you serious? Are you and yours now attacking the medicine, that provides relief to Covid-19 patients?
Except that there is mounting evidence that he may well be either making money directly or helping out a large campaign contributor by touting
that drug.
Are you serious? Are you and yours now attacking the medicine, that provides relief to Covid-19 patients?
On 04-08-20 07:53, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Nice <=-
If I was the president and someone asked me if I was trying to make
money off the anti-malaria drug, I'd tell them as
nicely as I can tha
they need to kiss my butt.
Except that there is mounting evidence that he may well be either making money directly or helping out a large campaign contributor by touting
that drug.
Are you serious? Are you and yours now attacking the medicine, that provides relief to Covid-19 patients?
I do not find any truth to the claim about what it is your discussing here.
Except that there is mounting evidence that he may well be either mak money directly or helping out a large campaign contributor by touting that drug.
Well in that case, let's flush the drug down the toilet then because if
we save lives with it then that would hurt the the democrats who want Trump to fail.
On 09 Apr 2020, Aaron Thomas said the following...
Well in that case, let's flush the drug down the toilet then because we save lives with it then that would hurt the the democrats who want Trump to fail.
There is a lot hate in here, remains of the FLAME WARS, no one in here
is a clinician or a Medical Doctor.
The President is not a Medical Doctor either, but he is a man of common sense.
Within that spirit of having common sense, that Michigan lawmaker who did take the drug and has sense recovered. If she followed the advise from
her fellow democrats would of continued to suffer or worse yet could of died.
Your assertion that she might have suffered further or died
had she _not_ taken that drug similarly: there's no evidence
for that.
On 04-09-20 00:06, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Nice <=-
Except that there is mounting evidence that he may well be either making money directly or helping out a large campaign contributor by touting
that drug.
Well in that case, let's flush the drug down the toilet then because
if we save lives with it then that would hurt the the democrats who
want Trump to fail.
On 10 Apr 2020, Dan Cross said the following...
Your assertion that she might have suffered further or died
had she _not_ taken that drug similarly: there's no evidence
for that.
It is logical to assume that she has recovered because of the drug, the woman even gave credit for Trump sounding off about this drug and she continued to go so far and suggest if it was not for Trump talking about this, she would of never known about it.
Where as your assertion is not remotely logical, which is, she would of gotten better all by herself by doing nothing. It is ludicrous to even debate with me over this. We have all seen that this virus is a beast
that kills, as it has already killed thousands, but there you sit smug
and determined to be right. I did not say these things, this is what the woman has declared. I know that burns your ass so badly you can hardly wait to respond, of which is very ignorant.
more than he already has. If he fails, even more Americans will die. It is bad that he failed to recognize the problem sooner and begin
preventive measures then. That failure cost American lives, but
On 04-11-20 11:19, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Nice <=-
more than he already has. If he fails, even more Americans will die. It is bad that he failed to recognize the problem sooner and begin
preventive measures then. That failure cost American lives, but
So the president is taking measures now, to save lives? And he didn't
take them early enough for you?
He's not a doctor, or a pandemic expert - I love my president, but I
don't see him saving lives. If my life were in danger, I wouldn't wait around for the president to save me.
Thanks for crediting President Trump with saving lives - I think that
took a lot of energy for you - but how is he saving lives? What
measures is he taking?
He finally is trying to get people to make PPE available to the front
line workers who are dealing with the pandemic. He is trying get people to make to get the much needed ventilators produced. Whether he (or his people) are doing those things in the best way is being questioned by some.
Two navy hospital ships are on each coast to offer some relief to over strained hospitals. The army corp is building field hospitals quickly.
Just think how much better things would have been if he had those things done even just 30 days earlier instead of waiting 70 days from his first briefing on the coming pandemic to take it seriously.
deaths -- but Trump has yet to even advise such a national directive
much less impose one. The states without such directives may soon
become future hot spots.
more than he already has. If he fails, even more Americans will die. is bad that he failed to recognize the problem sooner and begin preventive measures then. That failure cost American lives, but
So the president is taking measures now, to save lives? And he didn't
take them early enough for you?
He's not a doctor, or a pandemic expert - I love my president, but I
don't see him saving lives. If my life were in danger, I wouldn't wait around for the president to save me.
Thanks for crediting President Trump with saving lives - I think that
took a lot of energy for you - but how is he saving lives? What measures is he taking?
Two navy hospital ships are on each coast to offer some relief to ove strained hospitals. The army corp is building field hospitals quickl
All of this was ordered and directed by Donald Trump.
With the first American that was infected the the Travel ban from China was established, then there was a travel ban with the European countries. This action alone saved many thousands of lives.
What were the democrats doing at this time, they are involved
Impeachment and before this there was the Impeachment hearings.
Furthermore what did the Democrats for American's suffering through this pandemic.
Just think how much better things would have been if China did not try
to hide it, they lied to the U.S. and to the rest of the world.
For that; the penalty must be severe.
I can't imagine the police trying to deal with oblivious Americans who aren't scared of the virus; trying to get them off the streets - it
would take a lot of police.
deaths -- but Trump has yet to even advise such a national directive >DS>much less impose one. The states without such directives may soon >DS>become future hot spots.
If the president can impose and enforce a stay at home order for the whole >country, but didn't, then I will have to agree with you on your disapproval.
I just don't see that being an option for the president though - can he >really take that kind of action though?
I can't imagine the police trying to deal with oblivious Americans who
aren't
scared of the virus; trying to get them off the streets - it would take a
lot
of police.
He can declare martial law.
On 04-12-20 08:52, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Nice <=-
On 12 Apr 2020, Dale Shipp said the following...
He finally is trying to get people to make PPE available to the front
line workers who are dealing with the pandemic. He is trying get people to make to get the much needed ventilators produced. Whether he (or his people) are doing those things in the best way is being questioned by some.
Two navy hospital ships are on each coast to offer some relief to over strained hospitals. The army corp is building field hospitals quickly.
All of this was ordered and directed by Donald Trump.
Just think how much better things would have been if he had those things done even just 30 days earlier instead of waiting 70 days from his first briefing on the coming pandemic to take it seriously.
With the first American that was infected the the Travel ban from
China was established, then there was a travel ban with the European countries. This action alone saved many thousands of lives.
What were the democrats doing at this time, they are involved
Impeachment and before this there was the Impeachment hearings.
Furthermore what did the Democrats for American's suffering through
this pandemic.
Just think how much better things would have been if China did not try
to hide it, they lied to the U.S. and to the rest of the world.
For that; the penalty must be severe.
On 04-12-20 09:46, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Nice <=-
deaths -- but Trump has yet to even advise such a national directive
much less impose one. The states without such directives may soon
become future hot spots.
If the president can impose and enforce a stay at home order for the
whole country, but didn't, then I will have to agree with you on your disapproval.
I just don't see that being an option for the president though - can
he really take that kind of action though?
I can't imagine the police trying to deal with oblivious Americans who aren't scared of the virus; trying to get them off the streets - it
would take a lot of police.
deaths -- but Trump has yet to even advise such a national directive much less impose one. The states without such directives may soon become future hot spots.
If the president can impose and enforce a stay at home order for the
whole country, but didn't, then I will have to agree with you on your disapproval.
Stay at home orders are helping flatten the curve on infections and
deaths -- but Trump has yet to even advise such a national directive
much less impose one. The states without such directives may soon
become future hot spots.
He can declare martial law.
But how can anyone enforce it?
I'm guessing that Trump looked at it that way.
He can declare anything he wants, but if he tried to "declare martial law"
then people, especially those with TDS, would rebel against the
authorities.
Nobody is listening to Trump more than they have to - am I right?
You & Dan Cross both have expressed your frustration with Trump's handling
of the crisis, but you're both very vague about what Trump should have done different or what he should be doing differently now.
I take it back - Dan did give some examples, such as increase government >research on the virus - but research has begun, according to the media. >They're saying that there are 2 vaccines being tested currently.
Trump didn't take the warning seriously 3 months ago? What could he have >done? 3 months ago, if Trump closed America to international travel "over a >virus" then Nancy Pelosi would lay a golden egg! Democrats & the media would >LOVE the opportunity to say "he's using some stupid virus as an excuse to >close the border because he's racist!"
He's not a psychic, not god, not a pandemiologist, just a guy who can lead >the country toward economic prosperity. We face horrible issues in life - >they can't all be pinned on the president. How about my middle school >principal? Was it his fault that some kid slugged me? "What a terrible >school! It's all that lousy principal's fault!"
Even today, the president still does not have a plan in regards to
the coronavirus pandemic. His incompetence in this matter is truly astounding.
Trump owns this mess. All of it.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dale Shipp <=-
He's not a doctor, or a pandemic expert - I love my president, but I
don't see him saving lives. If my life were in danger, I wouldn't wait around for the president to save me.
On 04-13-20 06:47, Richard Falken <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Nice <=-
Stay at home orders are helping flatten the curve on infections and
deaths -- but Trump has yet to even advise such a national directive
much less impose one. The states without such directives may soon
become future hot spots.
Something I wonder: if he had issued a Federal level
directive two months ago, wouldn't Governors and partisans
alike have eaten Trump's guts?
Even today, the president still does not have a plan in regards to
the coronavirus pandemic. His incompetence in this matter is truly >LL>astounding.
I don't know how it is for other Americans - but I've got access to testing.
Access to a ventilator is at my Democratic governor's discretion.
You can praise South Korea or Japan all you want, but nobody is immune to
this crisis, and no country on earth "has it under control."
Trump owns this mess. All of it.
Let's impeach him again. Congress still has NOTHING better to do.
There needs to be a lot more testing, along with labs to analyze
the results in a timely fashion. There are some 330 million Americans, and only around 100,000 have been tested. That tells us very little.
There needs to be a lot more testing, along with labs to analyze
the results in a timely fashion. There are some 330 million
Americans, and only around 100,000 have been tested. That tells LL>us very little.
It would be sweet if they would test everyone, door to door, but that kind
of control doesn't exist, does it?
Will you let Trump come to your door and test you?
Worked for South Korea. Why is that a problem for the USA?
Will you let Trump come to your door and test you?
Hell no.
On 04-14-20 23:16, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Nice <=-
There needs to be a lot more testing, along with labs to analyze
the results in a timely fashion. There are some 330 million Americans, and only around 100,000 have been tested. That tells us very little.
It would be sweet if they would test everyone, door to door, but that
kind of control doesn't exist, does it?
Will you let Trump come to your door and test you?
On 04-14-20 23:16, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Nice <=-
There needs to be a lot more testing, along with labs to analyze
the results in a timely fashion. There are some 330 million American and only around 100,000 have been tested. That tells us very little.
It would be sweet if they would test everyone, door to door, but that kind of control doesn't exist, does it?
My state has drive through testing -- but only with a doctor's orders. There are not enough test kits to do it any other way. I.e. one has to
be showing severe symptoms before they can get tested. Meanwhile they
may well have infected many others without knowing.
Will you let Trump come to your door and test you?
I would prefer that he not set foot in my state. But if he did, he
would have to wear a face mask.
Let's impeach him again. Congress still has NOTHING better to do.
Of course some people prefer not accept change and to live with w/ high crime, and dirty cities. You might be used to it, as others obviously
are.
Perhaps if your state had more Republican leadership, things would
improve greatly.
Let's impeach him again. Congress still has NOTHING better to do.
Good idea! Especially since he's now threatened to
basically disband congress.
It's a fact that states with Democratic leadership have
generally better stats in all major areas: lower unemployment,
On 04-16-20 08:28, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Nice <=-
Of course some people prefer not accept change and to live
with w/ high crime,
and dirty cities. You might be used to it, as others obviously are.
Perhaps if your state had more Republican leadership, things would
improve greatly.
Let's impeach him again. Congress still has NOTHING better to do.
Good idea! Especially since he's now threatened to
basically disband congress.
It's a fact that states with Democratic leadership have
generally better stats in all major areas:
I do not know why you think that people might prefer to live in high
crime and/or dirty cities. If that is where they live, they probably
have very little choice.
Perhaps if your state had more Republican leadership, things would improve greatly.
My state's Republican Governor is doing quite well with respect to the current covid crisis, much better than Trump is doing. The same is true of many Democratic Governors I could name.
Let's impeach him again. Congress still has NOTHING better to do
Good idea! Especially since he's now threatened to
basically disband congress.
You're hilarious! What's "basically" mean? That he didn't really say it?
It's a fact that states with Democratic leadership have
generally better stats in all major areas: lower unemployment,
But you said you're not a Democrat - why not then?
If progress is positive, what is congress?
Apparently you have not been to San Francisco, California
since it has become a shit-hole.
It could be a expedition w/ a education;
You may begin to have the understanding, just how wrong you have been.
It does not matter as you're going to continue to live in a dream world.
Some like to be led instead of leading, of which is your prerogative.
Your going to disagree with me and / or twist and / or take out of
context anything that I have to say. So It's much easier for me to agree to disagree.
You're hilarious! What's "basically" mean? That he didn't really say
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/493253-trump-faces-roadblocks-with-thr o-adjourn-congress
There was a time when you could have an intelligent policy
conversation with a conservative; now, conservatives are
You're hilarious! What's "basically" mean? That he didn't really
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/493253-trump-faces-roadblocks-wit o-adjourn-congress
I sympathize with disabled Americans, and I don't mean this disrespectfully, but reporters who say "he floated the idea" have a form of autism where they're unable to understand sarcasm. The president does have a sarcastic sense of humor at times, and I feel bad for the
reporters who take his silly comments as gospel.
There was a time when you could have an intelligent policy
conversation with a conservative; now, conservatives are
It seems like we're trying to shock each other with heavy doses of our >political philosophies. Not Trump's fault. Not Obama's fault. It's the >policies fault.
I want illegals deported because I've been threatened by them in the past,
and I don't like their barbaric, murderous ways.
If I was the president and someone asked me if I was trying to make
money off the anti-malaria drug, I'd tell them as
nicely as I can tha
they need to kiss my butt.
Except that there is mounting evidence that he may well be either making money directly or helping out a large campaign contributor by touting
that drug.
On 10 Apr 2020, Dan Cross said the following...
Your assertion that she might have suffered further or died
had she _not_ taken that drug similarly: there's no evidence
for that.
On 04-09-20 00:06, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Nice <=-
You are so off base, it is not funny.
No one wants Trump to fail any
more than he already has.
If he fails, even more Americans will die.
It
is bad that he failed to recognize the problem sooner and begin DS>preventive measures then.
How about his calls for armed insurrection in three
states with duly elected democratic governors?
Trump is a tool. You clearly have TDS.
1. Our actions have been flawless.
2. Everything is entirely under control.
3. You, the adoring masses, bask in a state
of perpetual bliss."
On 09 Apr 2020 at 06:31p, Gregory Deyss pondered and said...
Where as your assertion is not remotely logical, which is, she would gotten better all by herself by doing nothing. It is ludicrous to eve debate with me over this. We have all seen that this virus is a beast that kills, as it has already killed thousands, but there you sit smu and determined to be right. I did not say these things, this is what woman has declared. I know that burns your ass so badly you can hardl wait to respond, of which is very ignorant.
Yes, it kills; indiscriminately even. But between 1%
and 3% of those who contract it.
But there's no evidence that hydroxychloroquine is an
effective treatment for it. If you have actual evidence,
by all means share it. If it's _actual_ evidence and
it's been verified, I'll admit I'm wrong.
| Sysop: | Zazz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Mesquite, Tx |
| Users: | 7 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 50:37:40 |
| Calls: | 157 |
| Files: | 2,109 |
| Messages: | 145,232 |