Hello Greg,

[..]

The Democratic Party is out of touch, and will lose again to Donald Trump.

People do not vote for a party, but for candidates of their choice.

One does not need to have insight like Nostradamus, to make such a
prediction.

I do not know any candidate by the name of The Democratic Party.

I seriously doubt the French seer Nostradamus ever did, either.
But he did write a few things (in cryptic verse) about Donald Trump.

--Lee

--
Everybody Loves Our Buns

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)

I do not know any candidate by the name of The Democratic Party.

Does it matter that I did not name them, my point was obviously they will ALL lose to or drop out of the race. One will remain and the last man or woman standing will lose to Donald Trump, I thought that was a obvious point.
However I am glad nonetheless, to clear up any confusion on your part.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/64)
* Origin: Capital Station BBS * telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org * (1:267/150)

Hello Greg,

I do not know any candidate by the name of The Democratic Party.

Does it matter that I did not name them, my point was obviously they will
ALL lose to or drop out of the race.

Bush41 was flying high after he single-handedly pushed Iraq out
of Kuwait in the Gulf War, his chances for winning a second term
virtually assured, as his approval ratings were over 90 percent.

In October 1991 a Democratic candidate from Arkansas entered the
race for the Democratic nomination. Nobody gave him a snowball's
chance in hell. He went on to win his party's nomination, and
the White House, on a theme cooked up by a mad Cajun by the name
of James Carville. "It's the economy, stupid!" became the rallying
cry of Bill Clinton, who went on to serve two consecutive terms,
leaving office with the highest job approval ratings in history.

Bill Clinton was not the only candidate who had pulled off such
a stunt. Jimmy Carter had done it in 1976, beating all the bigwigs
in his own party to claim the nomination of his party, en route to
winning the presidency. "Only the best" was his mantra.

It is anybody's game at this point in time. A new candidate
just entered the race, with no poll numbers at all. Nobody is
assured of winning the nomination, much less the election.

One will remain and the last man or woman standing will lose to Donald
Trump, I thought that was a obvious point.

Bill Weld may win the Republican nomination, putting an end
to Donald Trump's reign of terror. Republicans will then rejoice,
if not only for a short time, as their chosen candidate prepares
to do battle with his Democratic opponent ...

If you do not believe that fantasy, here is another one -

Unlike the last election, the American people will decide who
they want, not the Russians. A legitimate president who would
serve them well.

However I am glad nonetheless, to clear up any confusion on your part.

Predictions are nothing more than guesses. Educated or not.
Prophecies, especially those made by Nostradamus, are a totally
different ballgame ...

--Lee

--
Erections, That's Our Game

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)

On 11 Jul 2019, Lee Lofaso said the following...

Hello Greg,

I do not know any candidate by the name of The Democratic Party.

Does it matter that I did not name them, my point was obviously they will
ALL lose to or drop out of the race.

Bush41 was flying high after he single-handedly pushed Iraq out
of Kuwait in the Gulf War, his chances for winning a second term
virtually assured, as his approval ratings were over 90 percent.

In October 1991 a Democratic candidate from Arkansas entered the
race for the Democratic nomination. Nobody gave him a snowball's
chance in hell. He went on to win his party's nomination, and
the White House, on a theme cooked up by a mad Cajun by the name
of James Carville.

I thought I remembered you suggested year ago that you were related to
James Carville. I could be mistaken.


"It's the economy, stupid!" became the rallying

cry of Bill Clinton, who went on to serve two consecutive terms,
leaving office with the highest job approval ratings in history.

Bill Clinton was not the only candidate who had pulled off such
a stunt. Jimmy Carter had done it in 1976, beating all the bigwigs
in his own party to claim the nomination of his party, en route to
winning the presidency. "Only the best" was his mantra.

It is anybody's game at this point in time. A new candidate
just entered the race, with no poll numbers at all. Nobody is
assured of winning the nomination, much less the election.

One will remain and the last man or woman standing will lose to Donald
Trump, I thought that was a obvious point.

Bill Weld may win the Republican nomination, putting an end
to Donald Trump's reign of terror.

Reign of Terror?
Excuse me, what reign of terror, only if your a Iranian.
Seriously though, do you even realize that today the stock market broke
another record today July 11, 2019


Republicans will then rejoice,

if not only for a short time, as their chosen candidate prepares
to do battle with his Democratic opponent ...

If you do not believe that fantasy, here is another one -

Unlike the last election, the American people will decide who
they want, not the Russians. A legitimate president who would
serve them well.

However I am glad nonetheless, to clear up any confusion on your part.

History will repeat itself, Trump will be out there in the polls appearing
like he is not really doing that great, (It really does give the Democratic party hope) - false hope but whatever. Then come September to October of
2020, you better sit down and hang on....
You are in for a real treat or a disaster, depending on which way you see things.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/64)
* Origin: Capital Station BBS * telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org * (1:267/150)

People do not vote for a party, but for candidates of their choice.

I must admit that I do in fact vote for a party. I can't be the only one.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Alcoholiday / Est. 1995 / alco.bbs.io (1:123/525)

Unlike the last election, the American people will decide who
they want, not the Russians. A legitimate president who would
serve them well.

You don't think that the primary winner will be the biggest gimmick available at the time? Whoever can use the most shock value to disgust conservatives; somebody who truly hates the health & safety of the American citizens; the
one who will incite race wars and create the most hostile social climate
among whites & non-whites; Kamala's got this.

The only thing she's missing, to be a success in the Democratic primary, is free health care for all who pass through the USA & Iran. <- That will seal
the deal for sure.

You know who's not going to be the primary winner? Tulsi Gabbard. The reason
is because she's a veteran; liberals hate that. How would they ever win the election if they back a person who served our country? People who are willing to serve our country are not going to be successful in the democratic
primary; valor doesn't win liberal votes, unfortunately; the opposite does.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Alcoholiday / Est. 1995 / alco.bbs.io (1:123/525)

On 07-11-19 21:32, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Nostradamus <=-

You know who's not going to be the primary winner? Tulsi Gabbard. The reason is because she's a veteran; liberals hate that. How would they

She is not the only veteran on the debate stage. But she is the only
one who spoke of nothing else.

ever win the election if they back a person who served our country?
People who are willing to serve our country are not going to be
successful in the democratic primary; valor doesn't win liberal votes, unfortunately; the opposite does.

Don't think that any of the Democrat hopefuls avoided service because of
a medical report of a bone spur. Did not seem to hurt the Republican
candidate last time.

Dale Shipp
fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net
(1:261/1466)


... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 03:02:03, 13 Jul 2019
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01
* Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)

at all. I am glad that people today have more choices, and that
there are multiple parties having candidates to choose from.

I agree, it's better to have choices. Sometimes, in my voting district, we
have local elections with candidates running unopposed; it's disheartening
when the unopposed candidate is from my least favorite party.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Alcoholiday / Est. 1995 / alco.bbs.io (1:123/525)

We survived having a black man as president. So why not a black woman?

Obama was pretty terrible, but I don't think he incited race wars; that's why not this particular black woman. Some other black woman would be fine. Since the democrats are experts at exploiting people of color, a black woman has pretty good odds for them.

The republicans don't exploit people of color though; they don't exploit
people of valor either. Whoever is best for us (best for our country in this case) is the one they will pick. (Not whoever looks the best on the cover of
a book.)

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Alcoholiday / Est. 1995 / alco.bbs.io (1:123/525)

Hello Aaron,

People do not vote for a party, but for candidates of their choice.

I must admit that I do in fact vote for a party. I can't be the only one.

It used to be, not so long ago, that people in Louisiana and most
of the South, had no choice but to vote for candidates in the
Democratic Party, as there were usually no Republicans on the ballot
at all. I am glad that people today have more choices, and that
there are multiple parties having candidates to choose from.

I am not criticizing folks who choose to vote the party line.
Some people continue to do so, as is their right. But I do find
today's choices as being much more open and democratic.

--Lee

--
Sleep With Someone New

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)

Hello Aaron,

Unlike the last election, the American people will decide who
they want, not the Russians. A legitimate president who would
serve them well.

You don't think that the primary winner will be the biggest gimmick
available
at the time? Whoever can use the most shock value to disgust conservatives; >somebody who truly hates the health & safety of the American citizens; the >one who will incite race wars and create the most hostile social climate >among whites & non-whites; Kamala's got this.

We survived having a black man as president. So why not a black woman?

The only thing she's missing, to be a success in the Democratic primary, is >free health care for all who pass through the USA & Iran. <- That will seal >the deal for sure.

Everything ought to be free. That is what I believe. And that is
what most people believe. Better for me to spend other people's money
rather than my own. Wouldn't you agree?

I have friends who are from Iran. They had to move here in order
to escape persecution due to their faith. Both have made it here in
the USA, and are thankful for what this country has done for them.
Every now and then, I have to remind them it is best to remain here
rather than to visit their former homeland. Iran does not treat
those who have left their shores in the same light as those who have
chosen to keep the faith in the wisdom of their mullahs.

That is something Americans fail to understand. And are fortunate
in that respect, given how other peoples are treated in other lands.

You know who's not going to be the primary winner? Tulsi Gabbard. The reason >is because she's a veteran; liberals hate that. How would they ever win the >election if they back a person who served our country? People who are
willing
to serve our country are not going to be successful in the democratic >primary; valor doesn't win liberal votes, unfortunately; the opposite does.

There are three veterans in the race for the Democratic nomination,
including one man who is openly gay. Which one the Democrats will
choose as their party's nominee is anybody's guess. But it would be
nice if the Republicans would consider a true veteran for their own
nominee.

--Lee

--
Erections, That's Our Game

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)

Hello Greg,

LL> >LL>I do not know any candidate by the name of The Democratic Party.
LL>
LL> >Does it matter that I did not name them, my point was obviously they will
LL> > ALL lose to or drop out of the race.
LL>
LL> Bush41 was flying high after he single-handedly pushed Iraq out
LL> of Kuwait in the Gulf War, his chances for winning a second term
LL> virtually assured, as his approval ratings were over 90 percent.
LL>
LL> In October 1991 a Democratic candidate from Arkansas entered the
LL> race for the Democratic nomination. Nobody gave him a snowball's
LL> chance in hell. He went on to win his party's nomination, and
LL> the White House, on a theme cooked up by a mad Cajun by the name
LL> of James Carville.

I thought I remembered you suggested year ago that you were related to
James Carville. I could be mistaken.

Distantly related. Cousin, many parts removed.

LL> "It's the economy, stupid!" became the rallying
LL> cry of Bill Clinton, who went on to serve two consecutive terms,
LL> leaving office with the highest job approval ratings in history.
LL>
LL> Bill Clinton was not the only candidate who had pulled off such
LL> a stunt. Jimmy Carter had done it in 1976, beating all the bigwigs
LL> in his own party to claim the nomination of his party, en route to
LL> winning the presidency. "Only the best" was his mantra.
LL>
LL> It is anybody's game at this point in time. A new candidate
LL> just entered the race, with no poll numbers at all. Nobody is
LL> assured of winning the nomination, much less the election.
LL>
LL> >One will remain and the last man or woman standing will lose to
Donald
LL> > Trump, I thought that was a obvious point.
LL>
LL> Bill Weld may win the Republican nomination, putting an end
LL> to Donald Trump's reign of terror.

Reign of Terror?

Some might call it that.

Excuse me, what reign of terror, only if your a Iranian.

And many others. Especially those south of the border.

Seriously though, do you even realize that today the stock market broke
another record today July 11, 2019

While that may be good news for the investors, it means nothing
to folks who have invested little or nothing in the stock market.
And why should they? They have mouths to feed, and have to earn
a living in order to to that. Investors have money to burn, and
even if they lost it all would have lots of money left over to
do with what they want.

What this country needs is a president who can provide the leadership
necessary to implement an economic policy that works for all Americans,
not just for a small handful of investors who put their faith in the
stock market.

Republicans will then rejoice,
LL> if not only for a short time, as their chosen candidate prepares
LL> to do battle with his Democratic opponent ...
LL>
LL> If you do not believe that fantasy, here is another one -
LL>
LL> Unlike the last election, the American people will decide who
LL> they want, not the Russians. A legitimate president who would
LL> serve them well.
LL>
LL> >However I am glad nonetheless, to clear up any confusion on your
part.
LL>

History will repeat itself, Trump will be out there in the polls appearing >like he is not really doing that great, (It really does give the Democratic >party hope) - false hope but whatever. Then come September to October of >2020, you better sit down and hang on....
You are in for a real treat or a disaster, depending on which way you see >things.

I am sure Trump will fight like hell to win a second term. But
it will be all for naught, as his Democratic opponent will be reminding
voters that real change is needed. That he/she can do a better job
than what they have now. IOW, make it a referendum on Trump, showing
the American voting public that a better world awaits them.

Oh what a sight it will be when the first openly gay president
takes the stage with his husband on January 20, 2021 ...

--Lee

--
Make Sure Your Next Erection Is In Safe Hands

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)

Hello Greg,

I do not know any candidate by the name of The Democratic Party.

Does it matter that I did not name them, my point was obviously they will
ALL lose to or drop out of the race.

Latest Trump casualty is Alex Acosta. Resigned in disgrace due
to his inability to properly prosecute a convicted sexual predator.

One will remain and the last man or woman standing will lose to Donald
Trump, I thought that was a obvious point.

According to most polls, of those currently running for the Democratic nomination, almost all of them are ahead of Trump. Although it is
possible the Democrats might nominate another McGovern or Mondale, it
is far from likely.

However I am glad nonetheless, to clear up any confusion on your part.

Republicans have a choice. Suicide with Trump. Or siding with
former governor Bill Weld, giving them at least a slim chance of
winning against whoever the Democrats put up.

--Lee

--
We Make Your Wet Dreams Come True

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)

Hello Greg,

I do not know any candidate by the name of The Democratic Party.

Does it matter that I did not name them, my point was obviously they will
ALL lose to or drop out of the race.

Latest Trump casualty is Alex Acosta. Resigned in disgrace due
to his inability to properly prosecute a convicted sexual predator.

One will remain and the last man or woman standing will lose to Donald
Trump, I thought that was a obvious point.

According to most polls, of those currently running for the Democratic nomination, almost all of them are ahead of Trump. Although it is
possible the Democrats might nominate another McGovern or Mondale, it
is far from likely.

However I am glad nonetheless, to clear up any confusion on your part.

Republicans have a choice. Suicide with Trump. Or siding with
former governor Bill Weld, giving them at least a slim chance of
winning against whoever the Democrats put up.

--Lee

--
Laying Pipe Since '88

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)

Oh what a sight it will be when the first openly gay president
takes the stage with his husband on January 20, 2021 ...

To hell with that idea, wake up from your dream, because that will not happen on January 20, 2021 and not does not have much potential of happening within the next fifty years.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/64)
* Origin: Capital Station BBS * telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org * (1:267/150)

at all. I am glad that people today have more choices, and that
there are multiple parties having candidates to choose from.

I agree, it's better to have choices. Sometimes, in my voting

district, we

have local elections with candidates running unopposed; it's

disheartening

when the unopposed candidate is from my least favorite party.

Run for office yourself
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
* Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)

Hello Greg,

Oh what a sight it will be when the first openly gay president
takes the stage with his husband on January 20, 2021 ...

To hell with that idea,

We have already had at least two presidents (Buchanan and Lincoln)
who were gay. So why not another?

wake up from your dream,

"Will I dream?" ~HAL9000 (gay computer in 2001: A Space Odyssey)

because that will not happen on January 20, 2021

Mayor Pete begs to disagree ...

and not does not have much potential of happening within
the next fifty years.

More likely within the next two years.

--Lee

--
We're Great In Bed

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)