I've used SyncTERM quite a bit for some of my wifi modem dev -- thanks
for your work on it.

To your question, 1.0 looks a bit closer to reality. Perhaps something
in the intensity direction of 1.1, but not quite all the way to it?
Dunno, just my opinion.

- Bo

On 12/14/2018 5:17 PM, Rob Swindell wrote:

Anyone here use SyncTERM for CBM/PETSCII emulation when connecting to C64 or C128 boards?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On 12/15/18, Rob Swindell said the following...

Anyone here use SyncTERM for CBM/PETSCII emulation when connecting to
C64 or C128 boards?

If yes, I have a request of you: compare the SyncTERM v1.0 C64 or C128 "screen modes" with those in the current v1.1b (beta) and let us (the SyncTERM dev-team) know *which* color representation best reflects what you would expect to see in a CBM/PETSCII terminal.

Here are some screen shot comparisons (C64 screen mode) if you just want to peek and comment quickly:
SyncTERM 1.0 screen shot: https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApZPvWcrEaRQvJl-cu1s0ogYogzkYg
SyncTERM 1.1b (current) screen shot: https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApZPvWcrEaRQvJl9cli-mEJjXu9k4g

I just started using it recently (Been and still am a NetRunner user) I never could get 1.0 to emulate it at least without the wrong fonts. I can use 1.1 though and although I am not used to the larger font it runs pretty well and looks pretty clean. I use it to log into my Commodore BBS' so I can see what
is being transmitted and what I am receiving and they are pretty much the
exact same.. Not sure if this is what you were looking for..

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
* Origin: The Wrong Number Family Of BBS' - Wrong Number ][ (1:267/157)