The one in my bedroom (locked in a biometric-lock small safe) - in
2-3 seconds. Probably less if I'm not fully asleep.
The thug has 2-3 seconds to block you from your gunsafe then....
that means they have to figure out the layout of the building, where the bedrooms are, and get there in that same 2-3 seconds... i think dan has
the advantage there if he is awakened by the sound of their entry...
yeah, that's a big "if" but depending on the setup, easily handled... especially if it is a two or three story building... we won't even
mention motion sensors and being able to tell where they are before they get too far in...
The act of killing babies is NOT protected by the Constitution.
There. Pretty simple, isn't it?
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of
religion..." ALL of the anti-abortion arguments are based on
their religion
Bullshit. I'm anti-abortion and could not care less about
religion. Speaking for myself, I'm against it because I don't
think an innocent baby should be killed because the mother is irresponsible/stupid, or for any other reason for that matter.
Adoption is always a better option.
... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
Henri Derksen wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Bullshit. I'm anti-abortion and could not care less about
religion. Speaking for myself, I'm against it because I don't
think an innocent baby should be killed because the mother is irresponsible/stupid, or for any other reason for that matter.
So you are going to pay 20 years for rising up that baby,
because the very young mother has no job, no income and is very
poor. As you are against abortion, YOU should pay the grow up of
that baby/child. Oh you do not want that? Then let that girl get
her abortion.
If you are not the father, it is NOT your business.
Adoption is always a better option.
So you think a raped 11 yr old kid should full fill here
pregnancy?
A very bad idea, because she is still a kid herself,
and the pregnancy will damage the health of her ungrown body too
much. Besides that, she is not mentally prepared to full fill
such a pregnancy at that age.
Sorry but YOU are NOT responsable for what others do at this
point, so mind your own business.
If I decide to ignore you, no one can change that than only me.
So be nice to me, to prevent me from ignoring you ;-).
The act of killing babies is NOT protected by the Constitution.
There. Pretty simple, isn't it?
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of
religion..." ALL of the anti-abortion arguments are based on
their religion
Bullshit. I'm anti-abortion and could not care less about
religion. Speaking for myself, I'm against it because I don't
think an innocent baby should be killed because the mother is
irresponsible/stupid, or for any other reason for that matter.
So you are going to pay 20 years for rising up that baby,
because the very young mother has no job, no income and is very poor.
As you are against abortion, YOU should pay the grow up of thatbaby/child.
Oh you do not want that? Then let that girl get her abortion.
If you are not the father, it is NOT your business.
The world can not produce enough food for every human being.
So producing unlimited baby's is a very stupid thing.
It will give too much pain to everyone concerned in that area,
because many childs will die, because of too less amount of food,
and that is very bad for the menthal health of the parents.
Adoption is always a better option.
So you think a raped 11 yr old kid should full fill here pregnancy?
A very bad idea, because she is still a kid herself,
and the pregnancy will damage the health of her ungrown body too much.
Besides that, she is not mentally prepared to full fill such a pregnancyat
that age.
Sorry but YOU are NOT responsable for what others do at this point,
so mind your own business.
In nature abortion happens too.her.
You know a female shark produces eggs to feed the baby shark growing in
You call that abortion too, as in your eyes every egg should grow up.grown
So than immediately stop eating eggs from chicken, they should all be
up.
Even the most part of your own seed is not growing up, what a waste.
But in nature that is not waste, but food for others.
... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
Ofcourse not.
If I decide to ignore you, no one can change that than only me.
So be nice to me, to prevent me from ignoring you ;-).
No, I'm not going to pay for that. The family of the mother can
pay for that.
If you are not the father, it is NOT your business.
It is if my tax dollars are being used to pay/support (which they
are).
Adoption is always a better option.
So you think a raped 11 yr old kid should full fill here
pregnancy?
No, I don't. I would make exceptions for rape/incest pregnancies.
So..... if I'm not responsible (what you said right there above),
why should I have to pay for anything related to this?
If I decide to ignore you, no one can change that than only me.
So be nice to me, to prevent me from ignoring you ;-).
You're free to do whatever you like regarding that.
Do you actually think I care if you ignore me?
... Post may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive
persons.
It is if my tax dollars are being used to pay/support (which they
are).
If the baby is made by a rape, that boy should pay the abortion or the adoption. If that boy is not found, the government should pay the abortion, until the police finds the boy. After that the boy has to
pay back afterwards.
[quote]
An 11-year-old girl in Ohio was allegedly raped by a 26-year-old
multiple times, leaving her pregnant, according to police reports. A
state law passed in April, but not yet in effect, says that victims like her won't have a choice to have an abortion -- they would have to carry and deliver their rapist's child.
The law prohibits women from obtaining an abortion after a fetal
heartbeat is detected, about five or six weeks into a pregnancy, before most women even know that they're pregnant.
The law provides no exceptions for rape or incest.
[/quote]
The law prohibits women from obtaining an abortion after a fetal
heartbeat is detected, about five or six weeks into a pregnancy,
before most women even know that they're pregnant.
The law provides no exceptions for rape or incest.
[/quote]
Ah - they joys of "freedom".
i think you missed my point... the rapist is/was 26 years old...
That was in your story AFTER I mentioned mine version, not before. So
your guy was a man, mine could be a boy, both males indeed.
Besides that, she is not mentally prepared to full
fill such a pregnancy at ??that age.
Would it be correct to issue a law, that a raped girl/woman should at
once visit a clinic to prevent her pregnancy? In this case she will not have the dilemma "to kill or not to kill". I believe that every girl in this world now knows that having sex may cause pregnancy.
PS: Besides, nowadays any sexual culprit can be traced by a DNA test.
PS: Besides, nowadays any sexual culprit can be traced by a DNA test.
Nevertheless ... no woman should ever be forcibly be committed to a child she did not willingly produce.
So you think a raped 11 yr old kid should full fill here
pregnancy? A very bad idea, because she is still a kid herself,
and the pregnancy will damage the health of her ungrown body
too much. Besides that, she is not mentally prepared to full
fill such a pregnancy at ??that age.
Would it be correct to issue a law, that a raped girl/woman should at
once visit a clinic to prevent her pregnancy? In this case she will not have the dilemma "to kill or not to kill". I believe that every girl in this world now knows that having sex may cause pregnancy.
pregnancy at ??that age.Besides that, she is not mentally prepared to full fill such HD>>>a
Would it be correct to issue a law, that a raped girl/woman
should at once visit a clinic to prevent her pregnancy? In
this case she will not have the dilemma "to kill or not to
kill". I believe that every girl in this world now knows
that having sex may cause pregnancy.
Do men know that too, or that they (the men) are a required
part of that pregnancy?
It is women, not men who abort babies.
PS: Besides, nowadays any sexual culprit can be traced by a DNA test.
So you think a raped 11 yr old kid should full fill here
pregnancy? A very bad idea, because she is still a kid herself,
and the pregnancy will damage the health of her ungrown body
too much. Besides that, she is not mentally prepared to full
fill such a pregnancy at ??that age.
Would it be correct to issue a law, that a raped girl/woman should at
once visit a clinic to prevent her pregnancy?
In this case she will not have the dilemma "to kill or not to kill".
I believe that every girl in this world now knows that having sex
may cause pregnancy.
kill". I believe that every girl in this world now knows
that having sex may cause pregnancy.
Do men know that too, or that they (the men) are a required
part of that pregnancy?
It is women, not men who abort babies.
PS: Besides, nowadays any sexual culprit can be traced by a DNA test.
On 06-02-19 00:23, Ward Dossche <=-
spoke to Alexander Koryagin about Re: Guns. <=-
PS: Besides, nowadays any sexual culprit can be traced by a DNA test.
Nevertheless ... no woman should ever be forcibly be
committed to a child she did not willingly produce.
So you think a raped 11 yr old kid should full fill here
pregnancy? A very bad idea, because she is still a kid herself,
and the pregnancy will damage the health of her ungrown body
too much. Besides that, she is not mentally prepared to full
fill such a pregnancy at ??that age.
Would it be correct to issue a law, that a raped girl/woman should at
once visit a clinic to prevent her pregnancy?
So you think it is her fault, that she is raped or got incest?
In this case she will not have the dilemma "to kill or not to kill".
She got pregnant against her will !
school.I believe that every girl in this world now knows that having sex
may cause pregnancy.
First: Many girls in poor countries do not get sexual education at
So they even do not know how live works, and got pregnant before they realise that, after missing one or two monthly periods.
Second: Rape or incest is not sex at free will for the girl/woman.
She could not prevent that unwanted conception against a strong man.
Third: In case of rape or incest, the man should be punished,
not the girl/woman.
In nature there is also abortion bacause of a bad health,
you can not always prevent that, sometimes unluckily.
Would you bring a woman to court if she got a natural unforced abortion?
Sorry but it is her body, and not any man has the right to tell her whatto
do or not, period.
Hopefully no women got pregnant against their will by you.
Good luck.
carriedIt is women, not men who abort babies.
I wonder haw hard abortions would be to get if it was the males that
the foetus...
PS: Besides, nowadays any sexual culprit can be traced by ak>a DNA test.
Does that make an unwanted pregnancy any easier for the woman?
It is women, not men who abort babies.
I wonder how hard abortions would be to get if it was the males that carried
the foetus...
Do you? Do you really?
PS: Besides, nowadays any sexual culprit can be traced by a > DNA test.
Does that make an unwanted pregnancy any easier for the woman?
If she is forced to carry it to term, what does it matter?
Nevertheless ... no woman should ever be forcibly be committed
to a child she did not willingly produce.
You better say, she wants to produce a dead child instead of a living
one. She probably thinks that child's live belongs to her.
It is women, not men who abort babies.
carriedI wonder how hard abortions would be to get if it was the males that
the foetus...
Do you? Do you really?
Yes - only casually of course, it is not keeping me up at night worrying.
PS: Besides, nowadays any sexual culprit can be traced by a > DNA test.
Does that make an unwanted pregnancy any easier for the woman?
If she is forced to carry it to term, what does it matter?
Indeed.
I wonder how hard abortions would be to get if it was the males that carried
the foetus...
Do you? Do you really?
Yes - only casually of course, it is not keeping me up at nightworrying.
Well, with three Chinese warships in Sydney harbor ... with hundreds
of horny Chinese sailors on board ...
If she is forced to carry it to term, what does it matter?
Indeed.
Just imagine the bondings those Aussie gals could make with those
dashing young men from China ...
"Some scientist ..." ... I can probably compile an interestingcatalogue
of nonsense which has been spread by scientists, including the world DD>WD> being flat.
Are you suggesting that it is not????
IMHO, the main feature of a Cesarean section is that everything is under full control during the operation. Actually, this operation a nice candidate for future robotic operations.
But there is statistics that speaks of steady increasing of the number
such operations. The main reason - a woman can choose it by herself.
"Some scientist ..." ... I can probably compile an interesting catalogue
of nonsense which has been spread by scientists, including the world
being flat.
Are you suggesting that it is not????
Of course it is not. We're living on the back of a turtle.
of nonsense which has been spread by scientists, including the DD>WD>>> world being flat.
Are you suggesting that it is not????
Of course it is not. We're living on the back of a turtle.
The "Great Flat Backed Turtle"?
"In Brazil, there's a belief that normal childbirth is something the
poor do"
Nevertheless ... no woman should ever be forcibly be committed to a child she did not willingly produce.
I would have to agree. As a rule I am against abortion except in cases
I do think though that unborn children should not be punished simply because they were unexpected, or inconvenient.
"In Brazil, there's a belief that normal childbirth is something the
poor do"
Believing is something you do in a church. People 'believe' because of a 'lack of facts'.
On Saturday June 01 2019 17:11, you wrote to Ward Dossche:
I would have to agree. As a rule I am against abortion except in cases
Then by all means refrain from having an abortion except in those cases.
But do not tell others that they should not have an abortion either.
I do think though that unborn children should not be punished simply
because they were unexpected, or inconvenient.
You are free to have your beliefs. But do not force them on others.
On Thursday June 06 2019 08:46, you wrote to me:
Contrary to opinons, beliefs are often based on religion and religious
believers usually have an urge to "convert" non believers. In the past not onl
by word, but also by the sword. Nowadays what we see now in the US is that
instead of the sword, the law is used to impose beliefs on others. Many states
are adopting laws that make abortion almost impossible. By democratically elected lawmakers...
If I used too wide a brush and you are not in that categorie, I apologize.
Today many women bear via a cesarean section. Very convenient. You
take a pill, got asleep, got a baby -- good morning, here you are! ;-) Some scientists say that in future all women will do this procedure.
Today many women bear via a cesarean section. Very convenient. You take
a pill, got asleep, got a baby -- good morning, here you are! ;-) Some scientists say that in future all women will do this procedure.
"Some scientist ..." ... I can probably compile an interesting catalogue of nonsense which has been spread by scientists, including the world
being flat.
I do think though that unborn children should not be punished
simply because they were unexpected, or inconvenient.
You are free to have your beliefs. But do not force them on others.
There is a difference between expressing an opinion or belief and
forcing that opinion on others.
I wasn't aware that I suggested or expected anyone else to agree or
abide by my opinion or belief.
It is if my tax dollars are being used to pay/support (which they
are).
If the baby is made by a rape, that boy should pay the abortion or the HD>> adoption. If that boy is not found, the government should pay the
abortion, until the police finds the boy. After that the boy has to
pay back afterwards.
boy???
[quote]
An 11-year-old girl in Ohio was allegedly raped by a 26-year-old
multiple times, leaving her pregnant, according to police reports. A
state law passed in April, but not yet in effect, says that victims like her won't have a choice to have an abortion -- they would have to carry
and deliver their rapist's child.
The law prohibits women from obtaining an abortion after a fetal
heartbeat is detected, about five or six weeks into a pregnancy, before most women even know that they're pregnant.
The law provides no exceptions for rape or incest.
[/quote]
If the baby is made by a rape, that boy should pay the abortion or
the adoption. If that boy is not found, the government should pay
the abortion, until the police finds the boy. After that the boy has
to pay back afterwards.
boy???
Yes, the one who made her pregnant.
[quote]
An 11-year-old girl in Ohio was allegedly raped by a 26-year-old
multiple times, leaving her pregnant, according to police reports. A
state law passed in April, but not yet in effect, says that victims
like her won't have a choice to have an abortion -- they would have to
carry and deliver their rapist's child.
The safety of the mother weights more than the unborn feutus.
removed.The law prohibits women from obtaining an abortion after a fetal
heartbeat is detected, about five or six weeks into a pregnancy, before
most women even know that they're pregnant.
If I was that girl, then I would try everything to get that foetus
The law provides no exceptions for rape or incest.
[/quote]
Never heard about the "morning after pill"
And second it was not her fault in that kind of cases.
If the baby is made by a rape, that boy should pay the abortion or HD>>>> the adoption. If that boy is not found, the government should pay
the abortion, until the police finds the boy. After that the boy has HD>>>> to pay back afterwards.
boy???
Yes, the one who made her pregnant.
i think you missed my point... the rapist is/was 26 years old...
that's not a "boy" by any standard ;) is he a male? sure... is he a man? that's questionable...
i know this... i'm on the side of the females... it is their body and no one else has any say in what they do with it, period...
Never heard about the "morning after pill"
i only quoted the article... i have heard of that medicine but i rather doubt that an 11 years old girl has... in this day in time, that may be
an erroneous doubt, though...
And second it was not her fault in that kind of cases.
of course...
Sysop: | Zazz |
---|---|
Location: | Mesquite, Tx |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 32:57:04 |
Calls: | 157 |
Files: | 2,095 |
Messages: | 145,215 |