Hello Everybody,
Funny that Zone 2 has an Echolist Keeper but no Echolist,
and Zone 1 has an Echolist but no Echolist Keeper.
3.4. Echolist Keeper
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is the duty of the Echolist Keeper to compile and make available a listing of Echoes on the Backbone whose list they maintain.
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone" to carr the echoes?
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone"
to carry the echoes?
Ahh David's back! Where have you been?
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone" NA>DD> to carr the echoes?
Ahh David's back! Where have you been?
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone" to carry the echoes?
I suspect that this "rule" was written by Z1...
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone"
to carr the echoes?
Ahh David's back! Where have you been?
Probably eating dust on his bike while discovering he really lives on an island and escape is impossible...
Funny that Zone 2 has an Echolist Keeper
3.4. Echolist Keeper
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is the duty of the Echolist Keeper to compile and make available a
listing of Echoes on the Backbone whose list they maintain.
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone" to carry the echoes?
I suspect that this "rule" was written by Z1...
David Drummond wrote to Nick Andre <=-
While I'm on the road I have limited connectivity - but I find other things out there to capture my interest day to day.
reasonsa3.4. Echolist Keeper
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is the duty of the Echolist Keeper to compile and make available
listing of Echoes on the Backbone whose list they maintain.
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone"to
carry the echoes?
I suspect that this "rule" was written by Z1...
if that's from the Z1-rejected Echomail Policy 1 (aka EP1) document, then yes, it originated in Z1 with input from moderators and others from all over the network, TTBOMK... Z1 rejected it, as written, for various
that i do not recall off hand...
carryFunny that Zone 2 has an Echolist Keeper but no Echolist,
and Zone 1 has an Echolist but no Echolist Keeper.
3.4. Echolist Keeper
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is the duty of the Echolist Keeper to compile and make available a
listing of Echoes on the Backbone whose list they maintain.
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone" to
the echoes?
I suspect that this "rule" was written by Z1...
Funny that Zone 2 has an Echolist Keeper
We do?
Could it be that Z2 has no Echolist because they have no "backbone" to carry
the echoes?
The idea of an Echolist Keeper was a proposal - for Zone 2 only.
The idea of an Echolist was a reality - for a select few in Zone 1.
The idea of any zone needing a "backbone" for a handful of echoes
is just plumb nuts.
I suspect that this "rule" was written by Z1...
More likely by only one nutcase rather than an entire zone ...
Hello Wilfred,
Funny that Zone 2 has an Echolist Keeper
We do?
It was a proposal. Just a proposal. For Zone 2 only.
Apparently never accepted by the Echolist Keeper to be.
Whoever he/she/it was supposed to be.
I suspect that this "rule" was written by Z1...
More likely by only one nutcase rather than an entire zone ...
Indeed! The chance of all of them agreeing on something would be most unlikely.
Funny that Zone 2 has an Echolist Keeper
We do?
It was a proposal. Just a proposal. For Zone 2 only.
Apparently never accepted by the Echolist Keeper to be.
Whoever he/she/it was supposed to be.
Even when there was nothing to "keep"?
So, this "person" (which is a robot), is a trained puppy to do
the bidding of the Z1C? Who trained it? If never trained, I sure
hope it does not pee or defecate on somebody's carpet ...
Nodelist Police Commissioner Van Velzen,
Probably eating dust on his bike while discovering he really lives on an island and escape is impossible...
You'll find out when you retire ... if you retire ... ever ...
Nodelist Police Commissioner Van Velzen,
Cool! I have been promoted to Commissioner by the head of "the Zone 1 Secre Society". Of course that was a secret too, so I didn't know that myself unt now...
SGID: 1:229/426 231D1BF0
On 07 Mar 19 07:41:16, Ward Dossche said the following to Nick Andre:
Probably eating dust on his bike while discovering he really lives onan island and escape is impossible...
You'll find out when you retire ... if you retire ... ever ...
I'll likely end up having to work for a long, long time.
Nick Andre wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
The discussions about you, Nodelist Police Commissioner Van Velzen,
Alexy "I can't Git No Satisfaction" Vissarionov and others continue at tremendous length in the Zone 1 Secret Society echoes.
I suspect that this "rule" was written by Z1...
More likely by only one nutcase rather than an entire zone ...
Indeed! The chance of all of them agreeing on something would be most
unlikely.
Having lived "the old days" there was a case to be made for an
institution such as "a backbone".
Then something happened...
\%/@rd
--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR41
* Origin: Ceci n'est pas un courriel (2:292/854)
TERRY ROATI wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
Having rejoined Fido after 15+ years and moved from Zone 6 Philippines
to Zone 3 Australia it would have made it easier if there were a Z3 echolist for the few echos we have in Z3 when setting up a new system
and of course it helps if there are changes (probably need a blue
moon).
I've heard arguments that with multiple feeds that there's no need for
an echolist (no backbone, ergo, no echolist) but the point that you
need to find out what's available, somehow, seems to be missed.
TERRY ROATI wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
Having rejoined Fido after 15+ years and moved from Zone 6 Philippines
to Zone 3 Australia it would have made it easier if there were a Z3
echolist for the few echos we have in Z3 when setting up a new system
and of course it helps if there are changes (probably need a blue
moon).
Yeah, there seems to be an aversion to the idea of an echolist, probably because people are averse to giving power to one person to maintain the list. Who said Anarchy is dead?
I've heard arguments that with multiple feeds that there's no need for
an echolist (no backbone, ergo, no echolist) but the point that you
need to find out what's available, somehow, seems to be missed.
... Have you done something wrong?
--- MultiMail/XT v0.51
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech
(1:218/700)
the point that you need to find out what's available, somehow, seems
to be missed.
I've heard arguments that with multiple feeds that there's no need for
an echolist (no backbone, ergo, no echolist) but the point that you
need to find out what's available, somehow, seems to be missed.
Just follow the STATS area for a couple of weeks. You'll get a pretty good idea of what's available and has traffic...
Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
Just follow the STATS area for a couple of weeks. You'll get a pretty good idea of what's available and has traffic...
SecretNodelist Police Commissioner Van Velzen,
Cool! I have been promoted to Commissioner by the head of "the Zone 1
Society". Of course that was a secret too, so I didn't know that myself untill now...
Probably eating dust on his bike while discovering he really lives on an
island and escape is impossible...
You'll find out when you retire ... if you retire ... ever ...
I'll likely end up having to work for a long, long time.
goodI've heard arguments that with multiple feeds that there's no need for
an echolist (no backbone, ergo, no echolist) but the point that you
need to find out what's available, somehow, seems to be missed.
Just follow the STATS area for a couple of weeks. You'll get a pretty
idea of what's available and has traffic...
Having rejoined Fido after 15+ years and moved from Zone 6 Philippines
to Zone 3 Australia it would have made it easier if there were a Z3
echolist for the few echos we have in Z3 when setting up a new system
and of course it helps if there are changes (probably need a blue
moon).
Yeah, there seems to be an aversion to the idea of an echolist, probably because people are averse to giving power to one person to maintain the list. Who said Anarchy is dead?
I've heard arguments that with multiple feeds that there's no need for an echolist (no backbone, ergo, no echolist) but the point that you need to find out what's available, somehow, seems to be missed.
how is someone going to find out about the stats echo in the first
place? catch-22...
how is someone going to find out about the stats echo in the first
place? catch-22...
Not really.
1) Hook up to a JamNNTPd based BBS nearby.
2) Spend some time reading up on the echoes sounding relevant. And
yes,
I know that not all "moderators" are all too eager to name "their" echoes well. Their loss...
3) Register on said JamNNTPd based BBS and start asking questions.
The rest is a walk in the park, far from Catch-22.
1) Hook up to a JamNNTPd based BBS nearby.
how? how can yo find them?
The rest is a walk in the park, far from Catch-22.
Read fidonews. The file, you know. :-D
Kurt Weiske wrote to Wilfred van Velzen <=-
Just follow the STATS area for a couple of weeks. You'll get a pretty good idea of what's available and has traffic...
We should all try to look at Fidonet from the point of view of a new/prospective sysop. I've seen some looking and others joining
recently.
Othernets do a much better job of showing what their nets have to
offer than we do.
Bj”rn Felten wrote to mark lewis <=-
how is someone going to find out about the stats echo in the first
place? catch-22...
Not really.
1) Hook up to a JamNNTPd based BBS nearby.
3) Register on said JamNNTPd based BBS and start asking
questions.
The rest is a walk in the park, far from Catch-22.
On 2019 Mar 10 18:31:48, you wrote to me:
how is someone going to find out about the stats echo in the first
place? catch-22...
Not really.
yes, really...
1) Hook up to a JamNNTPd based BBS nearby.
how? how can yo find them? catch-22 from the start...
2) Spend some time reading up on the echoes sounding relevant. And
yes,
I know that not all "moderators" are all too eager to name "their" echoes
well. Their loss...
3) Register on said JamNNTPd based BBS and start asking questions.
The rest is a walk in the park, far from Catch-22.
you start with a double catch-22...
1. newbies to fidonet won't even know what a JAMNNTPd server/BBS
is...
2. where are they going to find these JAMNNTPd systems...
I'll likely end up having to work for a long, long time.
Nobody should have to work. Ever.
In my view, everything ought to be free. That way, we would
all have the leisure to do whatever want, if and whenever we want.
Nobody would be forced to do a thing for anybody else, as that
would be a form of slavery or indentured servitude.
how is someone going to find out about the stats echo in the first
place? catch-22...
Not really.
1) Hook up to a JamNNTPd based BBS nearby.
2) Spend some time reading up on the echoes sounding relevant. And yes, I know that not all "moderators" are all too eager to name "their" echoes well. Their loss...
3) Register on said JamNNTPd based BBS and start asking questions.
The rest is a walk in the park, far from Catch-22.
Been there. Done that. But no STATS echo found.
Oh. There it is. Do I have to add it first before
I can read it?
numberThe rest is a walk in the park, far from Catch-22.
you start with a double catch-22...
1. newbies to fidonet won't even know what a JAMNNTPd server/BBS
is...
2. where are they going to find these JAMNNTPd systems...
Do they need to know? Is it essential to know this to obtain a node
and get connected to Fidonet? I think not.
 By: Tommi Koivula to mark lewis on Sun Mar 10 2019 08:36 pm
Read fidonews. The file, you know. :-D
fidonews.org - the first thing it shows me is newsletters from 1999.
Real helpful.
Lee Lofaso wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
I've heard arguments that with multiple feeds that there's no need for an echolist (no backbone, ergo, no echolist) but the point that you need to find out what's available, somehow, seems to be missed.
A pencil and paper works for me. :)
Dan Clough wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
Very good point. Most Othernets that I've seen publish (usually
weekly) an "infopack.zip" or similar. It contains *GOOD*
instructions on how to apply for a node number (including *WHO* to
apply to!), a list of echos, a recent nodelist, and more. Really
very helpful in getting setup for a new network, regardless of previous/current Fido experience.
news.fidonet.fiBy: Tommi Koivula to mark lewis on Sun Mar 10 2019 08:36 pm >>
Read fidonews. The file, you know. :-D
fidonews.org - the first thing it shows me is newsletters from 1999. >>
Real helpful.
Indeed.
Maybe I should start publishing the magazine at fidonews.mine.nu or
I think Fidonews should be published whenever there is some actual content to read, then people would actually read it.
Maybe I should start publishing the magazine at fidonews.mine.nu ornews.fidonet.fi
I think Fidonews should be published whenever there is some actual content read, then people would actually read it.
Kurt Weiske wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Very good point. Most Othernets that I've seen publish (usually
weekly) an "infopack.zip" or similar. It contains *GOOD*
instructions on how to apply for a node number (including *WHO* to
apply to!), a list of echos, a recent nodelist, and more. Really
very helpful in getting setup for a new network, regardless of previous/current Fido experience.
Contrast with Fidonet - "Find a regional coordinator, set up your
system with a /9999 address, poll them, and wait an indeterminate
time for instructions..."
"You want a list of echoes? Google Fidonet echoes, and hopefully
you'll find the updated web page."
Now, I'm liking the idea of a Fidonet infopack with as much
timely information as we can muster and clear instructions.
Maybe I should start publishing the magazine at fidonews.mine.nuor news.fidonet.fi
I think Fidonews should be published whenever there is some actual
content to read, then people would actually read it.
I think Fidonews should be published whenever there is some actual content
to read, then people would actually read it.
Indeed. Nowadays there's nothing much than all the same shit week by
week posted by a robot. Plan to support the current form of fidonews withdrawn.
Contrast with Fidonet - "Find a regional coordinator, set up your
system with a /9999 address, poll them, and wait an indeterminate
time for instructions..."
Careful, that's a little too clear and concise. I don't think we
should tell a n00b to use /9999, they should have to figure that
out for themselves, like our Grandpas did... :
Once upon a time Fidonet sysops were "computer enthusiasts". Now they have turned into "point and click"ers.
David Drummond wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Good point. I know P4 documents that, but the point was that the instructions could be done much better. Many of the Othernets
"infopacks" are great examples of this. I believe there are some
works in progress on trying that for Fidonet... :)
There have been "infopacks" published in the past, time and time
again. They tend to favour particular software and as that
software is "superseded" then the "infopack" becomes obsolete.
Once upon a time Fidonet sysops were "computer enthusiasts". Now
they have turned into "point and click"ers.
Once upon a time Fidonet sysops were "computer enthusiasts". Now they have turned into "point and click"ers.
they haveOnce upon a time Fidonet sysops were "computer enthusiasts". Now
turned into "point and click"ers.
JavascriptOnce upon a time Fidonet sysops were "computer enthusiasts". Now theyhave
turned into "point and click"ers.
Everyone has to start somewhere. I've been working in the IT industry all my
life, and have programmed in everything from Assembler to C++ to
andsoftware
beyond. That doesn't mean that I can just sit down in front of any
package and be an expert in it within minutes. Especially one that is not documented, or the documentation is hidden/horrendously out of date.they
Many folks I know who are getting back into BBSing are doing it because
want to tinker again -- homelabbers are popping up everywhere. But theyall
need guidance. Someone to help them, not criticize everything they do.They
want and are looking for a community - not some rigid, unchanging, "Well wait
10 years and MAYBE we'll think about it" hierarchy.
Once upon a time Fidonet sysops were "computer enthusiasts". Now they have
turned into "point and click"ers.
The problem I noted when Windows came out was that it allowed people that shouldn't be allowed to be in the same room with a computer to use them - sort of
Maybe I should start publishing the magazine at fidonews.mine.nu
or news.fidonet.fi
I think Fidonews should be published whenever there is some actual
content to read, then people would actually read it.
Have you considered submitting an article?
When I have something close to being interesting to anyone to read I will consider it.
they haveOnce upon a time Fidonet sysops were "computer enthusiasts". Now
turned into "point and click"ers.
The problem I noted when Windows came out was that it allowed people that shouldn't be allowed to be in the same room with a computer to use them - sort of
On 11/03/2019 16:30, Joacim Melin -> Tommi Koivula wrote:
Maybe I should start publishing the magazine at fidonews.mine.nu
or news.fidonet.fi
I think Fidonews should be published whenever there is some actual
content to read, then people would actually read it.
Have you considered submitting an article?
David Drummond wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Contrast with Fidonet - "Find a regional coordinator, set up your
system with a /9999 address, poll them, and wait an indeterminate
time for instructions..."
Careful, that's a little too clear and concise. I don't think we
should tell a n00b to use /9999, they should have to figure that
out for themselves, like our Grandpas did... :
Could it be that Grandpa managed to read the Fidonet Policy which documented that procedure?
Could it be that Grandpa managed to read the Fidonet Policy which
documented that procedure?
Good point. I know P4 documents that, but the point was that the instructions could be done much better. Many of the Othernets
"infopacks" are great examples of this. I believe there are some
works in progress on trying that for Fidonet... :)
Sysop: | Zazz |
---|---|
Location: | Mesquite, Tx |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 03:36:39 |
Calls: | 157 |
Files: | 2,103 |
Messages: | 146,005 |